the backstory of how the poison arrived at the Skripal’s door

They arrived at Britain’s Gatwick airport at 3pm on Friday March 2 on Aeroflot flight SU2588 from Moscow. They then travelled to London Victoria railway station and cross the Thames to Waterloo station on the Southbank. They stayed there for about an hour between 6pm and 7pm.

From there they travelled to the City Stay Hotel in Bow Road, East London, where they stayed for two nights.

Their trip to Salisbury on Sunday March 4 was not their first.

CCTV still shows Ruslan Boshirov and Alexander Petrov at Salisbury train station on March 3, 2018.

CCTV still shows Ruslan Boshirov and Alexander Petrov at Salisbury train station on March 3, 2018.

Photo: Metropolitan Police

They had travelled from Waterloo station to Salisbury by train the day before for what police believe was a reconnaissance trip. They took the underground to Waterloo and from there caught the train to Salisbury, arriving about 2.25pm.

They left Salisbury less than two hours later and arrived back in London at 8pm.

Twelve hours later they were back at Waterloo to travel to Salisbury again, this time to allegedly administer the deadly weapon. As police locked down the sleepy town of Salisbury, the Russians arrived back in Waterloo and took the underground to Heathrow Airport.

A photo dated August 9, 2006, shows Sergei Skripal talking from a defendants' cage to his lawyer during a hearing at the Moscow District Military Court.

A photo dated August 9, 2006, shows Sergei Skripal talking from a defendants’ cage to his lawyer during a hearing at the Moscow District Military Court.

Photo: Kommersant

From there they returned home to Moscow, leaving on Aeroflot flight SU2585 at 10.30pm.

“We have no evidence that they re-entered the UK after that date,” Britain’s top counter-terrorism police official, Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, said.

“It’s almost impossible in this country to hide, almost impossible,” said John Bayliss, who retired from the Government Communications Headquarters, Britain’s electronic intelligence agency, in 2010. “And with the new software they have, you can tell the person by the way they walk, or a ring they wear, or a watch they wear. It becomes even harder.”

The investigation into the Skripal poisoning, known as Operation Wedana, will stand as a high-profile test of an investigative technique Britain has pioneered: accumulating mounds of visual data and sifting through it.

… without bothering to produce any evidence, they announce a list of some ‘Russian agents’ … to justify London and Washington’s witch hunt.

Maria Zakharova, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman

Basu broke months of silence in a hastily convened Scotland Yard news conference on Wednesday, taking the unusual step of stripping journalists of their electronic devices to keep the news under wraps until arrest warrants for the two men, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, had been issued. Two hours later, Prime Minister Theresa May announced that British intelligence services had identified the men as officers in the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence service.

Russian officials responded witheringly, declaring in a Foreign Ministry statement that “we decisively reject these insinuations”.

“It is impossible to ignore the fact that both British and American colleagues act according to the same scheme: without bothering themselves to produce any evidence, they announce a list of some ‘Russian agents’ in order to justify London and Washington’s witch hunt,” said Maria Zakharova, a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman.

Bayliss said that all along, investigators have been acutely aware that the suspects would be protected in Russia and never tried, though Interpol red notices and domestic and European arrest warrants were issued.

Ruslan Boshirov and Alexander Petrov at Salisbury train station.

Ruslan Boshirov and Alexander Petrov at Salisbury train station.

Photo: AP

“There are a lot of people who would sort of give up on it, because what’s the point?,” he said. “They’re in Russia, we’re not going to get them back. But the thing is, once you’ve got it to that point, that means those people can’t leave Russia.”

Beyond that, Bayliss said, “there is a satisfaction of getting to the truth, to be able to prove to the Western world that the Russians did this.”

The day of the attack, Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, were found barely conscious on a bench beside the Avon River. (They both recovered, but months later, two Britons, Dawn Sturgess and Charlie Rowley, fell ill after being exposed to the poison. Sturgess died.)

In the days that followed the Skripal attack, investigators began by collecting 11,000 hours of video from ports, train stations, shop windows, car dashboards and the roadways around Sergei Skripal’s house.

Before searching for a needle, investigators said wryly, they first had to build their own haystack.

Personnel in hazmat suits walk away after securing the covering on a bench in the Maltings shopping centre where former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found critically ill.

Personnel in hazmat suits walk away after securing the covering on a bench in the Maltings shopping centre where former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found critically ill.

Photo: AP

The investigation drew on some of Scotland Yard’s most storied assets, like its Super-Recogniser Unit. Its officers are selected for their superior ability to remember faces — the opposite of prosopagnosia, also known as “face-blindness”.

“They don’t concentrate on the obvious: the graying hair or the mustache or the glasses,” the unit’s founder, Mick Neville, told Britain’s Sky News last week. “They look at the eyes, the mouth, the ears — the things that don’t change. They can recognise a face from the tiniest glimpse of part of it.”

In cases such as the Skripal investigation, which begin with an enormous pool of potential suspects, super-recognisers can help by singling out people who seem to move suspiciously, experts say. Local police officers are often brought in to help them eliminate bystanders, like small-time drug dealers, who may also appear suspicious.

Those results were then overlaid with passport data for Russians who left the country shortly after the poisoning, bringing the pool of suspects down to a manageable number. The police were able to cross-reference suspects in other ways, mapping mobile phone and bank card use, for example.

“It’s a bit like a funnel, the top of the funnel has a vast amount going in, and by the time the liquid comes out at the bottom, it narrows down to a tiny stream,” Bayliss said.

Investigators had one bit of luck: Heavy snow fell through the weekend of the attack, reducing the number of people on the streets.

A big breakthrough took place nearly two months after the Skripals were poisoned, when the police arrived at the City Stay Hotel in East London, where the two suspects had spent the two nights before the attack. Officers took samples from the room where the two men had stayed, and sent them for laboratory testing. Two of them showed trace contamination for the nerve agent used in the attack.

On Wednesday, as news of the charges spread, neighbours peered curiously at the building, which had smeared windows and dingy artificial grass.

“I just got a shiver, a cold shiver,” said Debbie Weekes, 47, who lives nearby. “It’s just shocking, I’m at a loss for words. You never know who’s around.”

Some wondered why they had not received a warning in May, when the police found the nerve agent traces in the hotel.

In Salisbury, though, the charges were greeted with relief. Matthew Dean, the head of Salisbury’s City Council and owner of a local pub, the Duke of York, said he hoped it would put to rest conspiracy theories circulating about the crime.

“This is a piece of closure,” he said.

Ceri Hurford-Jones, the managing director of Salisbury’s local radio station, saluted investigators for their “sheer skill in getting a grip on this, and finding out who these people were.”

It may not have been the stuff of action films, but Hurford-Jones did see something impressive about the whole thing.

“It’s methodical, plodding,” he said. “But, you know, that’s the only way you can do these things. There is a bit of Englishness in it.”

New York Times, with Latika Bourke

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *