Trump Almost Gets Assassinated and Clinton Says What?

lev radin / shutterstock.com
lev radin / shutterstock.com

Senator Marco Rubio has publicly criticized Democratic leaders for what he perceives as their role in inciting violence against former President Donald Trump through their rhetoric.

Rubio’s comments come in the wake of an incident involving an individual who allegedly attempted to harm Trump, marking this as a second such occurrence. Rubio’s contention is that the inflammatory language used by Democrats has directly influenced these would-be assailants, suggesting a pattern where political discourse might be fueling dangerous actions. This statement reflects Rubio’s ongoing critique of the political opposition’s tactics, highlighting a concern over the potential real-world consequences of heated political rhetoric.

Almost immediately following the second assassination attempt on Trump, Hillary Clinton had the audacity to say, “a danger to our country and the world.”

Kamala Harris also claimed that Trump was an “existential threat to our democracy.”

Since the mainstream media sees nothing wrong with spreading this kind of rhetoric, members of the GOP are coming forward – and Rubio has been one of the loudest voices.

On Tuesday, Rubio told America’s Newsroom: “If you repeatedly say someone is going to be the next Adolf Hitler or the next Mussolini… you eventually have to conclude that the overwhelming majority of people that see that are going to say, ‘We better vote against this guy,’ but there are enough lunatics and nutjobs out there who are going to take the next step and say, ‘Well, this guy is truly evil, this guy is truly dangerous. If our democracy and our system of government is going to be wiped out if this guy wins, I need to take this guy out.'”